Clean Sheet Rate
8
22% clean sheet rate · 36 matches
5th in MLS
Match by Match
Clean Sheet Rate per match · chronological
Orlando City SC
1 – 0
New York City FCNew York City FC
4 – 0
DC UnitedNew York City FC
1 – 1
CF MontrealNew York City FC
2 – 1
San Jose EarthquakesDC United
2 – 1
New York City FCPhiladelphia Union
0 – 2
New York City FCNew York City FC
1 – 2
Orlando City SCColumbus Crew
2 – 3
New York City FCNew York City FC
3 – 1
Atlanta United FCFC Dallas
1 – 1
New York City FCReal Salt Lake
2 – 1
New York City FCOrlando City SC
0 – 3
New York City FCAtlanta United FC
3 – 1
New York City FCNew York City FC
2 – 2
New England RevolutionNew York City FC
2 – 1
Philadelphia UnionNew York City FC
2 – 1
Seattle SoundersNew York Red Bulls
0 – 2
New York City FCNew York City FC
3 – 1
Minnesota United FCVancouver Whitecaps
3 – 2
New York City FCNew York City FC
2 – 2
Toronto FCNew York City FC
2 – 1
Chicago FireToronto FC
4 – 0
New York City FCNew York City FC
3 – 2
New York Red BullsLos Angeles Galaxy
0 – 2
New York City FCNew York City FC
2 – 1
New England RevolutionNew York Red Bulls
1 – 1
New York City FCNew York City FC
1 – 0
Sporting Kansas CityNew York City FC
0 – 1
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
1 – 1
New York City FCNew York City FC
1 – 1
Houston DynamoCF Montreal
0 – 1
New York City FCChicago Fire
1 – 1
New York City FCNew England Revolution
2 – 1
New York City FCNew York City FC
2 – 2
Columbus CrewColumbus Crew
4 – 1
New York City FCNew York City FC
2 – 0
Columbus CrewSeason average0.2
League Rankings
Clean Sheet Rate per match · all teams · 2017 season
Sporting Kansas City
0.92Toronto FC
1.03Seattle Sounders
1.14Atlanta United FC
1.15New York City FC
1.36Houston Dynamo
1.37New York Red Bulls
1.38Columbus Crew
1.49Vancouver Whitecaps
1.410Philadelphia Union
1.411FC Dallas
1.412Portland Timbers
1.413Chicago Fire
1.514Colorado Rapids
1.515Real Salt Lake
1.616Orlando City SC
1.717CF Montreal
1.718DC United
1.819New England Revolution
1.820San Jose Earthquakes
1.921Los Angeles Galaxy
1.922Minnesota United FC
2.1